Collaborating Lecturer

I believe that the incorporation of environmental professionals into the public service requires more than technical knowledge; it must include an understanding of the regulatory, institutional, and social frameworks in which decisions are made that impact territory, ecosystems, and citizens, as well as an acceptance of the responsibility inherent to exercising public power legitimized by social trust.

Therefore, preparing environmental scientists for access to senior public administration roles should not be seen merely as technical training but as an opportunity to consolidate judgment, service vocation, and a sense of responsibility.

In this sense, the responsibility of the instructor in designing coherent training content aligned with autonomous, national, and European legal frameworks responds to the need to contribute to a responsible exercise of public power oriented toward the general interest.

Training school of the Official Association of Environmental Scientists of Catalonia

Environmental Expert Witness

Contrary to common belief, the issue is not what is evaluated, but under what conditions truth can be asserted when it produces legal and social effects; the expert witness intervenes where the conflict requires a stabilization of meaning, where knowledge is expected to transform uncertainty into a stable point, while knowing that this knowledge can act as premature closure, as a technical pretext or, in certain uses, as a substitute for judicial decision-making when the report ceases to guide the decision and instead functions as a replacement. What is then demanded of truth in that context? Not a conclusive assertion, but a strict relationship with what can be sustained, with its limits and with the inherent consequences of stating it. The problem is not the absence of an answer, but the constant pressure to say more than the framework of knowledge itself allows.